Are humans really that bad at theory-based judgments? The effect of evolutionary relevance of the content
Humans constantly have to detect covariations among many events, especially the ones in their social surrounding. Imperfections of this process led some authors to argue that an “intuitive scientist” is not capable of precise assessment of covariations. Here we argue that the tasks used in previous...
| Permalink: | http://161.53.241.124/Record/ffzg.KOHA-OAI-FFZG:309214/Similar |
|---|---|
| Matična publikacija: |
Studia psychologica 53 (2011), 2 ; str. 163-168 |
| Glavni autori: | Hromatko, Ivana (-), Hrgović, Josip (Author) |
| Vrsta građe: | Članak |
| Jezik: | eng |
| Online pristup: |
Elektronička verzija članka |
APA stil citiranja
Hromatko, I. (2011). Are humans really that bad at theory-based judgments? The effect of evolutionary relevance of the content: Are humans really that bad at theory-based judgments? The effect of evolutionary relevance of the content. Studia psychologica, p. 3.
Chicago stil citiranjaHromatko, Ivana. "Are humans really that bad at theory-based judgments? The effect of evolutionary relevance of the content: Are humans really that bad at theory-based judgments? The effect of evolutionary relevance of the content." 2011: 3.
MLA stil citiranjaHromatko, Ivana. "Are humans really that bad at theory-based judgments? The effect of evolutionary relevance of the content: Are humans really that bad at theory-based judgments? The effect of evolutionary relevance of the content." 2011: 3.